True, true. It would definitely get around that. -Jared
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Brian Candler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:08:21AM -0500, Jared Scheel wrote: >> Hmm, didn't think about that. I guess you will need to have some kind >> of request body anyways. Do you think that the request method should >> be set in the data though, or should it be set in the header, since >> the method/header defines how the data should be interpreted? I know >> that's just splitting hairs, but there was some concern about keeping >> the api as clean as possible. > > I think the whole point is to support minimal HTTP clients. If they don't > support PUT or DELETE, there's a good chance they don't support custom HTTP > headers either. >
