On 16/05/2009, at 8:45 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
Hi Antony, thank you! I encountered this "one more byte" problem
once before, but it wasn't 100% reproducible, so I wasn't really
comfortable checking in a workaround. I've basically been waiting
to see if it would ever show up for anyone else :-/
I think we should commit this change, but I'd still like to confirm
that the attachment on the target is not corrupted by the chunk
processing issue (i.e. the last chunk starts with a \r or something
like that). Or even better, fix the chunk processing issue.
Given my results, will you commit that fix?
Antony Blakey
-------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
When I hear somebody sigh, 'Life is hard,' I am always tempted to ask,
'Compared to what?'
-- Sydney Harris
