Hi Paul, I was thinking we wouldn't even patch this particular bug in 0.9.1. Do you think we should? I suppose now's the time, since I just checked in the code to fix COUCHDB-398 and we're otherwise ready for Noah to cut another release. Cheers,

Adam

On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Paul Davis wrote:

Also my new version would probably only exacerbate this issue.

To do this proper we should add a stats end point to query the raw
values. Adding the counter could be done incrementally, but applying
my patch would surely not make it into the 0.9.x branch as its a hefty
change.

As Adam just posted, I'd change this with the minimal code needed for
0.9.x and then make sure the updates fix it proper.

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Robert
Dionne<[email protected]> wrote:
Adam,

there's also a nit in init_timers, 3 of them are off by a zero according to
the comments, though these will be made moot by Paul's new version

Cheers,

Bob


On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:

Well, hmmm .... fixing the counters so that /_restart actually restarts the counters was easy enough, but now I've discovered another bug. The part
of the stats test that fails is

couchdb.open_databases.max < 5

Let's review.  There are two types of counters in the stats module:
absolute and incremental. For incremental counters, the mean/min/ max/stddev
calculations measure the *rate of change* of the counter.  The
open_databases counter is an incremental one, so couchdb.open_databases.max measures the rate of DB creation, not the largest number of open DBs! I
think the test should simply be

couchdb.open_databases.current < 5

I also think this was a reason why the test suite was only failing
intermittently -- it really depended on how quickly Couch could create new files. We should review the tests for other cases like this at some point.

I'm cleaning my edits up now and will check stuff in shortly. Cheers,

Adam

On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:36 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Adam Kocoloski<[email protected] >
wrote:

Yes, it was the 0.9.1 tarball that failed for me.

The fix is as easy as disabling the test, so if we're going to do
anything I
think we might as well fix it. Cheers,


+1 on backporting a fix, since it's so simple.

Adam

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 29, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Adam Kocoloski<[email protected] >
wrote:

On Jun 25, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Wojciech Kaczmarek wrote:

Hi!

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 14:51, <[email protected]> wrote:

got an error on the testsuite on Fedora 11 :

on the test "stats" : # Assertion 'open_databases > 0 && max >= open_databases, name' failed: should keep the same number of open
databases
when reaching the max_dbs_open limit

I've had the same error for 0.9.0 when I ran couchdb as root
(different architecture though, it was OSX 10.4 PPC). I haven't
investigated why is it so, just noticed that test failed w/ root and
passed otherwise.

I also see this failure running CouchDB on OS X 10.5.7 as a non-admin
user.
I think we might want to dig into this a bit more and either fix it or
disable the test before releasing 0.9.1.

Adam


I haven't seen this failure in a while, but if it's the 0.9.1 release candidate that's failing, I wouldn't be against disabling the test.

Can we confirm that it's the 0.9.1 tarball that fails? Works for me
here.

Chris

--
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io




--
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io




Reply via email to