0.10.0 is not 1.0, so it'll still be beta whatever's in it. i've found
0.9 quite stable, consider reporting problems to jira or the mailing
list.

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:48 PM, Sergey<[email protected]> wrote:
> Excuse me for interrupting.
> Personally, I've been waiting for some stable CouchDB release for
> months now, since there is some stuff that I'd like to run on it. The
> beta state is holding me from migrating to couchdb or even trying it
> as a worthy alternative.
> May be you should do some really stable release and then proceed with
> new features?
>
> With best regards,
> Sergey.
>
>
>
> 2009/7/3 Robert Newson <[email protected]>:
>> Given the downstream work that a release will cause (to package
>> maintainers, etc), I worry about a time-based release approach. That
>> said, I'm sure there'll be compelling new features and enhancements by
>> the end of the month anyway (deterministic revs, pretty please?).
>>
>> B.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Thad Guidry<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> My feedback would be:  Were those features worthy of waiting for?  If the
>>> larger community has a need for those features, then perhaps it was best to
>>> wait?  Although CouchDB dev  may be trying to emulate similar approaches
>>> such as Fedora and Ubuntu with quick release cycles for the sake of growth
>>> of the project?  Is that your thinking, Damien?
>>>
>>> - pushed from the sidelines of project development.
>>>
>>> -Thad
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Damien Katz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think we plan on doing a 0.10.0 release within the next month or so, as
>>>> it's been 3+ months since we did 0.9.0.
>>>>
>>>> We shouldn't worry about what features are ready, we should just pick a
>>>> date to make a  0.10.x branch and then no new features go into the branch
>>>> after that, just bug fixes. If it's not in trunk at that time, then it's 
>>>> not
>>>> in the branch. We wait a week or so to see if any bugs are found, patch the
>>>> branch as we go. Once we have a stable branch, then we release 0.10.0.
>>>>
>>>> I propose Friday, July 31st as the 0.10.x branch date. I don't care that
>>>> much about the exact, but I do want to pick a date and stick with it,
>>>> because I don't want to get into the same situation we did with 0.9.0, 
>>>> where
>>>> it was held up for months as we waited way too long for features I was
>>>> working on. (sorry)
>>>>
>>>> All feedback welcome.
>>>>
>>>> -Damien
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to