On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:05:47PM -0400, Damien Katz wrote: > But I think we are stable and large enough to warrant date-based releases. > Especially since we now many people are working concurrently on the code base. > Delaying the release because a feature isn't ready means users have to choose > between old code and apis, or potentially unstable features and apis. Time > based releases also means new code get tested sooner in real world conditions, > which helps improve the quality of the trunk too.
How about making this formal then, instead of ad-hoc? We could set four quarterly milestones to release by, one every three months. If 0.9.1 counts as our third this year, our next would be September. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
