[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Anderson updated COUCHDB-377:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: query_proc.patch
All I did hear was refactor the calls into the query-server fun to make them a
little cleaner to deal with in the code itself (from the perspective of adding
new query_server features).
I like where Mark's going with this.
> allow native view servers
> -------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-377
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-377
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Hammond
> Attachments: native_query_servers.patch, native_query_servers.patch,
> query_proc.patch
>
>
> There has been some discussion on IRC etc about how to support 'native' view
> servers, such as 'erlview' in a generic way. Currently using erlview
> requires you to modify couch.
> I'm attaching a patch as a first attempt at supporting this. In summary, the
> patch now looks up a new 'native_query_servers' config file section for a
> list of view_server names with a {Module, Func, Args} style string specifying
> the entry-point of the view server. The code now passes an additional atom
> around indicating if the PID is 'native' or 'external', and map_docs takes
> advantage of this to avoid the json step. This patch allows erlview to work
> for me, but in theory any erlang code could be used here.
> I'm very new at erlang - please let me know if I should make stylistic or
> other changes, or indeed if I should take a different approach completely.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
