On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:04:34PM +0100, Jason Davies wrote: > All in all, it seems to me that reusing _rev for history saves us having > to doing an additional read and an additional write (reading the old doc > or attachment and then writing it as an attachment). Is this a good > enough reason to reuse _rev for this?
Without wanting to get involved in the technicalities of the discussions I will say that with all other things being equal, I would prefer a system that reused _rev for document history. That so many of our users try to do this naturally should be clue enough that it might be a good direction to take. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
