On 18 Aug 2009, at 09:10, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:38, Jan Lehnardt<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Paul,
<snip/>
Related:
- Do we want to foster plugins, extensions and other infrastructure
software or do we want to rely on the non CouchDB open source world
to come
up with them?
I think, that's the real question: What software does the CouchDB
project want to provide to its users as (a) product(s).
If you have the answer to that, you can still decide how to organize
it and how to call it.
For example, Apache Lucene provides Lucene (a programming framework)
and Solr (a ready-to-go server). Both a complimentary.
More important, they nurse each other with new feature. This ain't no
one way street.
Thanks, that's what I was trying to say.
If there is software which is really important in the CouchDB
ecosystem, I'd try to take them (code + people) onboard.
+1
Cheers
Jan
--
