On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:48:36AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > Forgive my ignorance, but I thought ISO-8859-1 was valid UTF-8. Or is > it just in the common no-high-bit-set ASCII that's UTF-8 compatible? > Either way, ISO-8859-1 is an encoding, not a content-type. Isn't > saying it's invalid JSON like saying UC-4 is invalid JPEG? XD
What?! Heh. ISO-8859-1 is an encoding of Unicode. UTF-8 is an encoding of Unicode. Neither are valid versions of each other. Neither are content types, or media types, or MIME types. Basically, LOL. Best, -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
