On 29 Sep 2009, at 15:29, Curt Arnold wrote:


On Sep 28, 2009, at 8:16 PM, Paul Joseph Davis wrote:

That is quite doable. I reckon I have an eta of 20-25 minutes before i'm back to !iPhone. Though me or someone else should double check what ended up being required for the oauth and ibrowse imports.

If it requires faxing I'm only comitting the check. I think that it didn't but we need to make certain. There was a big thread on it. The only keywords comming to mind are uncertain, uneasy, or similar. First email was from Curt Arnold I do believe.

Yay release!



I took a quick peek at the Github for ETAP. A quick peek did not reveal what license ETAP uses. Did I miss it? One of the big qualifiers in the quoted email was a 3rd party dependency with an ASF compatible license.

The "unease" thread was related to using GitHub for collaborative development where the mailing list community is unaware of a big development effort until it hits the SVN in an already gelled state and can no long influence the design. Doesn't really bear on pulling something from GitHub.

There is a license header here, e.g.:

http://github.com/ngerakines/etap/blob/master/src/etap.erl

including:

%% to deal in the Software without
%% restriction, including without limitation the rights to use,
%% copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
%% copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
%% Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following
%% conditions:
%%
%% The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
%% included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

Cheers
Jan
--

Reply via email to