On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Paul Joseph Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris, > > Do you think the uuids fix is worth a new vote? The 040-utility.t patch > isn't enough by itself IMO. Anyone else able to think of reasons for or > against? >
We have to vote on the release artifact, even if it is a formality. A cursory glance at the source doesn't reveal any other raw binary Etags, but if anyone else can look, too, it wouldn't hurt. The uuids fix is trivial but the bug is kinda icky... it's intermittent, so people won't understand why they are getting random malformed header http errors only sometime. I think I'm talking myself into a +1 on the retag. > Paul > > > > On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I noticed some UUID fixes and an etap change targeted at 0.10.x. >> >> Should we recall the vote for these? >> > -- Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couch.io
