[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-540?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12769315#action_12769315
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-540:
-------------------------------------------
@Chris
Ahh, we're just classifying differently. I still consider the user auth bits
config data, but I don't work with systems that have lots and lots of users.
Moving the user config data and treating it differently than the config data
would probably include writing a whole new system for dealing with it. Not out
of the question, but I think the current plan is to run with the _users
database method.
@Eric,
Does it not? I haven't kept up as closely as I should on Jason's work with the
different bits. I'm pretty sure that's the direction he's going though so I
think this will be solved as work progresses. I'd agree that the
local_users.ini is a much less elegant solution.
> oauth_token_users seems to be in the wrong place
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-540
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-540
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Infrastructure
> Affects Versions: 0.10
> Environment: Ubuntu Linux
> Reporter: Chris Jones
>
> If one has many users, the oath_token_users section of /etc/couchdb/local.ini
> becomes quite large. This:
> a) makes legitimate configuration of the server less friendly
> b) makes the file extremely hard to manage via version control
> c) is probably a violation of the FHS.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
