Hi Robert, I believe that's done. A simple merge didn't work because
of divergences in the code base, but in r832780 I wrote an 0.10
version of the fix.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-559 bothers me a little
bit. The problem is that folks on 0.9.1 cannot trigger a replication
to/from 0.10.0 because of a list_to_existing_atom error. We could fix
this by suppressing the disk_format_version field from 0.10.1's
response to GET /dbname. I don't know of any other solution at the
moment.
I guess I'd be OK with saying that replication between 0.10.x and
0.9.x only works if you trigger it on the 0.10.x machine, although
that's a bit annoying. Anyone else have an opinion?
Best, Adam
On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Robert Newson wrote:
As mentioned on IRC, we should backport the schedule bug fix. The
symptom is 100% cpu usage on systems that sleep and then resume.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 17:31, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote:
we've seen a bunch of fixes in the 0.10.x branch that
warrant a 0.10.1 release. I think now is a good time to
cut it.
Sounds great to me. Is there a changelog somewhere noting the fixes
so far?
Cheers,
Dirkjan
