On 18 Nov 2009, at 00:13, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 17 Nov 2009, at 16:20, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On 16 Nov 2009, at 20:33, Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> >>> On 16 Nov 2009, at 19:27, Paul Davis wrote: >>> >>>> What version of Spidermonkey are you running? >>> >>> 1.9.1.4 >>> >>>> The 0.10.x branch has been patched to >>>> work with newer versions. Is this something we should patch, or should >>>> I just have the check say "Your version of spidermonkey is too new" or >>>> something else? >>> >>> If you like, but that would also prevent me from releasing. ;) >>> >>> I'm not about to downgrade my system to make the release, as such a thing >>> isn't possible. >>> >>> How hard will the backport be? >>> >> >> I am okay with 0.9.x not supporting newer spidermonkeys. >> >> I'm happy to set you up with a box that has the correct dependencies >> installed to make the release. > > It was indeed very simple. I committed a fix for 0.9.2. > Thanks Paul for pointing in the right directions and > verifying. Thanks Noah for testing.
That wasn't the whole story. I now backported (r882928) all of COUCHDB-288 to the 0.9.x branch and tested it with the old and new libmozjs. I think we (Noah) can roll the release now. Noah, I accidentally committed to the 0.9.2 tag at first. I believe you're going to delete it prior to packaging anyway, so I didn't bother reverting my mistake. Cheers Jan --
