Yeah, if they can show you've read the patent they get "willful
infringement damages" and other bits. As a FOSS I've been trained to
never ever read patents. The M/R one just kinda sprung up and caught
me like a deer in headlights.

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Daniel Truemper
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> see also Doug Cutting's comment in the Mahout project [1]:
>
>> > you or any other apache guy are NOT qualified to judge if a patent applies
>> +1, nor whether its owner objects to your use of any patent.
>>
>> I would generally discourage folks from doing patent research when 
>> implementing Apache code. It is usually both a waste of time and dangerous, 
>> since it opens you to the possibility of treble damages. In particular, if 
>> you are involved in patching this issue, please do not read the above cited 
>> patent.
>>
>> A patent holder may tell us if they believe we have infringed their patents. 
>> We should generally wait for that event, and not pro-actively seek 
>> permission.
>
>
> The Hadoop people probably don't care as well [2]. There is IBM and Yahoo and 
> many others using it that have the money for other suits to oppose this 
> patent. If there were a case I doubt the patent would withstand the fact that 
> map and reduce are around for some time now and that this really is nothing 
> new...
>
> Daniel
>
> [1]: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-31
> [2]: 
> http://gigaom.com/2010/01/19/why-hadoop-users-shouldnt-fear-googles-new-mapreduce-patent/
>
> Am 20.01.2010 um 14:55 schrieb David Coallier:
>
>> 2010/1/20 Paul Davis <[email protected]>:
>>> I'm not concerned. Our implementation isn't really like Google's.
>>> Single M/R invocations don't get spawned across multiple hosts or have
>>> automatic restart when nodes fail which is suggested as the crux of
>>> their patent. They cite implementations for working with large data
>>> sets that don't have those features as prior art. Not that I spent
>>> three years of my life in law school...
>>>
>>
>> Good to hear, I could hear the suits getting animated here.
>>
>> --
>> Slan,
>> David
>
>

Reply via email to