On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:06, Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble with views that emit Date objects in the
> key (running latest trunk)?

>From memory, I wonder if emitting Date objects for
JSON.stringification is valid according to the spec. I remember that
the Firefox JSON implementation was somewhat restrictive about what it
allowed to be passed to JSON.stringify at first, but I don't remember
the exact rules.

One difference I think is that in SpiderMonkey 1.7 you don't have
built-in JSON (so you fall back to actual json2.js). I'm not sure
exactly when that was introduced, but it might well be in SM 1.8.

Cheers,

Dirkjan

Reply via email to