On 22 February 2010 11:43, Matt Goodall <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 22 February 2010 11:28, Matt Goodall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 22 February 2010 10:53, Brian Candler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:32:50AM +0000, Matt Goodall wrote: >>> > Before 0.11 gets released ... after creating the first admin user in a >>> > completely fresh install of the 0.11.x branch I see a _users database >>> > containing only design doc, i.e. no doc for the new user. Subsequent >>> admin >>> > users do get added the the _users db. >>> >>> Is the first admin user created in local.ini then? >>> >>> I thought *all* admin users ended up created in local.ini. At least, when >>> I >>> created two admins via futon, I got them both in local.ini. But I haven't >>> tested this for a week or so. >>> >> >> The first admin user added to in local.ini but not in the _users database. >> >> Subsequent admin users are added to local.ini and the _users database. >> > > OK, I seem to be getting different behaviour on different machines. Let me > look into it more first, perhaps I didn't install something correctly > (although I tried multiple times and just did the same on a new machine). > Looks like a timing problem. Gut feeling says the slower machine the more likely it is to occur but that's entirely speculative. So, when it work I see the following in the couchdb log: [info] [<0.101.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'PUT' /_config/admins/matt 200 [info] [<0.100.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /_session 200 [info] [<0.101.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'POST' /_session 200 [info] [<0.101.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /_session 200 [info] [<0.100.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'PUT' /_users/org.couchdb.user%3Amatt 201 And when it fails I see: [info] [<0.105.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'PUT' /_config/admins/matt 200 [info] [<0.95.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /_session 200 [info] [<0.95.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'PUT' /_users/org.couchdb.user%3Amatt 409 [info] [<0.105.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'POST' /_session 200 [info] [<0.105.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /_session 200 Both of those were run on the same machine with a completely fresh couchdb install (deleted between runs) and a newly opened chromium "incognito" window to avoid browser caching between sessions. It looks like there's two concurrent async requests and it just depends on which one completes first ... but I haven't looked at the JS code to prove that. Just for extra information, on a faster machine I've not seen it fail yet and on a slower machine I've not seen it succeed. Like I said, that's a speculative conclusion based on the playing I've done here. - Matt
