Oh, technically we could. The issue here is social and organisational. On 6 Mar 2010, at 23:35, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 6 Mar 2010, at 16:48, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >>>> That cannot happen. The official site is kept in ASF Subversion. >>> >>> This is orthogonal to the rest of the proposal. >> >> No it's not. >> >> The main site has to be from Subversion, and any additions or merges to >> Subversion have to be provided by someone who has signed a copyright >> agreement, or checked the box in JIRA, or otherwise indicated that they are >> allowed to contribute the work, and are happy for it to be licensed the way >> it will be licensed. >> >> > > Noah, > > Can you point me to the information concerning the main site being > required to be served from SVN? The FAQ [1] for the Confluence wiki > explicitly covers using a dump as a project's main site, so I can't > fathom that we wouldn't be able to pull in a subdirectory from outside > SVN. The restrictions covered in the FAQ are that we can't put user > contributions into a release tarball or in SVN, but no one is > suggesting that since it'd require all contributions to be covered by > an ICLA or similar. > > AFAICT, this would be equivalent to us mirroring the coverage reports > generated by buildbot. > > Paul > > [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/
