On 19 Mar 2010, at 12:50, Noah Slater wrote: > > On 19 Mar 2010, at 17:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> We want to test the CouchDB code, not the browser's HTTP handling. > > Sure, but as one of CouchDB's primary interfaces is the browser, it seems to > makes sense that we would want to test how this works. Testing from the > browser allows us to test for and catch problems introduced by caching, etc - > which is what our real world users would be running into. > > Unless I'm missing something?
I fully agree, but we should have a separate browser interaction suite for that. The test suite is a very untypical browser client and doesn't really test real-world browser use-cases. Cheers Jan --
