Okay, I did some research and came across http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b
Our dependencies are: - Erlang, http://erlang.org/ License EPL: http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/lang/erlang/EPLICENSE - Spidermonkey, Mozilla's JavaScript engine, http://www.mozilla.org/js/spidermonkey/ License MPL/GPL/LGPL tri-license - ICU, IBM Components for Unicode, http://icu-project.org/ License ICU (MIT like: http://source.icu-project.org/repos/icu/icu/trunk/license.html) And the URL above clearly states that we can ship binaries with these included if we label the binary accordingly. So I think there is no legal issue and we can proceed as planned (see my next mail). I mentioned a potential legal issue to Mark on IRC just because I wasn't sure about the situation but I *was* sure that I wanted to be rather safe than sorry. Cheers Jan -- On 31 Mar 2010, at 13:12, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I've set the status to "blocking" which means we'll review it in the process > of > releasing 1.0. No promises yet, though :) > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > On 29 Mar 2010, at 18:53, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Before the release of CouchDB 1.0, it would be great if you could fix #665. >> The patch is very simple, as it is just the missing 'inet6' option which >> prevents replication to work via IPv6. Merging/testing the patch is also >> very simple and should not take longer than 15 minutes. If you have any >> questions, please just ask (and please CC me, as I am not on this list). >> >> Best regards, >> Michael >
