I just want to kick the tires on this before we start locking things up for 1.0.
Do we think we can get this in? -Mikeal On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:36, Mikeal Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd like to propose the following changes to the view server protocol >> for list functions. >> >>>>> ["lists", "name"] >> <<< ["getRow"] >>>>> ["list_row", {"key":"k","value":"v"}] >> <<< ["getRow"] >>>>> ["list_row", {"key":"k","value":"v"}] >> <<< ["start", "chunk", {"headers":{}, "code":200}] >> <<< ["send", "chunk"] >> <<< ["send", "chunk"] >> <<< ["getRow"] >>>>> ["list_row", {"key":"k","value":"v"}] >> <<< ["getRow"] >>>>> ["list_end"] >> <<< ["end", "tail chunk"] >> >> The big change is that there is no longer a strict request/response. >> The erlang side stays idle accepting chunks to send until it gets a >> ["getRow"] call. > > Hopefully it will be called get_row rather than getRow, if we already > have list_row? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan >
