On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > 1.0 should be relatively stable though. So if we're planning to replace the > patch with another patch that works differently, is that a good idea. Or do > you think both things could live side by side without any trouble? >
They could live together, but it may be redundant at the end. Is this a problem If we have some time I could work on another solution. For now I fail though to find a way to get final port from couch in the shell script. The only simple way I see for now is to name the CouchDB node and then call some specific function with erlang that return the correct information. The list of nodes could be get via erlang too. But do we want to name the nodes ? (via -sname or such) . If we don't name the nodes, there may be a way to do it via os pids, but I don't know it yet. - benoit
