On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > Thanks for the clarifications, Jan. > All makes sense now. 0.11.x has to continue to exist and be fulfill > its "stated use". > New features should be reverted out of there. >
Sounds good to me, but I'm not sure about what's worth removing from 0.11.x and what isn't. I suppose if anything would be an impediment to a smooth upgrade for a 0.11 user, it should be backed out. As I recall most of the stuff in 0.11.x isn't new features (maybe some feature refinements) so unless it could mess up someone's day, I don't think it's crucial to un-backport it. > Yeah. We're in agreement. Chris
