On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:41 AM, David Coallier wrote: > On 29 June 2010 18:41, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:20 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote: >> >>> For trunk, I think there are a couple of small patches that Adam wants to >>> hold back for 1.1. >> >> Not a big deal, everything I committed to trunk is pretty stable and tested >> in production. I tagged those commits as 1.1 because they weren't strictly >> bugfixes, but given that we're adding other performance improvements in 1.0 >> I'd be happy to have them included. > > I'd like to include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-489 > in 1.0 as well. > > Depending on when the 1.0 date is "planned" to be, I'll free some time > up from work to fix this once and for all. >
Sorry I didn't see this patch before I implemented a continuous = true checkbox (see trunk now) if your patch is preferable then we can swap it for mine. Should I take the time to apply and test, or is Trunk good? Chris > -- > David Coallier
