And this is the same test but with much smaller documents: http://mikeal.couchone.com/graphs/_design/app/_show/compareWriteReadTest/e69057a29bd6e4ac4ae0115fac0193c9
The coolest part is that it looks like our read performance has stabilized quite a bit. -Mikeal On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Damien Katz <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome! I think most of this is due to Adam and Randall. Nice work guys :) > > -Damien > > On Jul 1, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > > > I don't know what we did, but in my tests the write performance on trunk > is > > about 3x faster than 0.11 > > > > > http://mikeal.couchone.com/graphs/_design/app/_show/compareWriteReadTest/e69057a29bd6e4ac4ae0115fac018487 > > > > The left vertical column is the average response time in ms and the > bottom > > horizontal line is the duration in seconds. > > > > This is comparing 50 writers and 200 readers using large document. I'm > also > > going to run the test with small documents to see how big the difference > is. > > Both are running with delayed_commits = false ; > > > > -Mikeal > >
