On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Damien Katz wrote: > I broke that code. Sorry. Thanks to Filipe for the fix and test. > > I agree with Adam we need to redo the release. Changing my vote to -1 >
I agree, let's roll it again now that these fixes are in and backported. Thanks Noah! Chris > -Damien > > > On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > >> On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:38 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, first round. >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>> artifacts so >>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. >>> Everyone is >>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in! >>> >>> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/ >>> >>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/ >>> >>> Happy voting, >>> >>> N >> >> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but I'm -1 on these artifacts. View >> group compaction is broken. The couch_view_group server calls >> couch_file:delete/1 to try to remove the current index file when the >> compaction is complete, but that function does not exist anymore - it's been >> replaced by couch_file:delete/2, which takes the root directory as the first >> argument. The process will crash, and will continue to use the old >> uncompacted file when it starts up again. >> >> It looks like we don't have a test for view group compaction. I'm pretty >> busy at the moment, perhaps someone else wants to take a look? It could be >> modeled off of the compact.js test for DB compaction. Best, >> >> Adam >> >
