Sebastian, is Firebug is completely disabled? Firebug tends to cause some odd 
behaviors. It sounds like you already have disabled it (via safe mode?), but I 
want to be sure.

-Damien


On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:

> On 09.07.2010, at 21:55, J Chris Anderson wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
>> 
>>> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; 
>>> en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
>>> 
>> 
>> Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache?
> 
> I run Firefox in safemode, when running the test suite. but running it in 
> normal mode (with firebug & co) I always clear the cache. so yes, I ensured 
> that the cache was empty. (I begin to dislike a browser-based integration 
> test suite more and more).
> 
>> Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the 
>> source directory:
>> 
>> test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes 
>> passes)
> 
> "ok 11 changes" looks okay. but after some tests (e.g. "ok 26 http") it 
> simply freezes. I've waited a few minutes, killed both couch and the test and 
> tried again. after the 10th run, the test suite runs through (with "not ok 16 
> cookie_auth TypeError: ddoc is null" and "not ok 43 replication 
> ReferenceError: $ is not defined").
> 
> 
> Sebastian
> 
>> Chris
>> 
>>> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test 
>>> however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all 
>>> test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it 
>>> is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have 
>>> not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, 
>>> but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I 
>>> see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' 
>>> /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing 
>>> for about a minute).
>>> 
>>> -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong)
> 
> *snip*
> 

Reply via email to