On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 18:02, Filipe David Manana <[email protected]>wrote:
> +1 on Benoît's comment. > > Using erlang_js, emonk or something equivalent should be top priority > I love this idea however as I am responsible for thousands of unrelated users' couches, I want significant assurance about the security and sandboxing of a new view server runtime. In other words, can CouchDB fix a few bugs in the 1.x branch while working on major improvements in 2.x? Specifically, the bug I cited is something so simple, so stupid, that CouchDB cannot process HTML form input. In this context, I do not care how impressive the back-end is. I just want good tools for web developers to use. I would definitely be frustrated to find myself on the API change treadmill. -- Jason Smith Couchio Hosting
