is this serious enough to justify pulling current 1.0.0 release binaries to avoid further installs putting data at risk?
On 8 August 2010 15:08, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes. Adam already back ported it. > > Sent from my interstellar unicorn. > > On Aug 7, 2010 8:03 PM, "Noah Slater" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Time to abort the vote then? > > I'd like to get this fix into 1.0.1 if possible. > > > On 8 Aug 2010, at 02:28, Damien Katz wrote: > >> Thanks. >> >> Anyone up to create a repair tool for w... >
