On 8 Aug 2010, at 21:24, Noah Slater wrote: > What you are suggesting isn archival of the release, which means removing it > from the downloads page, the distribution directory, and the mirrors. I can > do this, but I'd like to know that we have consensus first. The plan as I > understood it was to archive this release at the same time as making the > 1.0.1 release.
I'd like to follow that plan. Cheers Jan -- > > On 8 Aug 2010, at 20:21, Robert Dionne wrote: > >> I would also consider removing the download link for 1.0.0 and not depend on >> users patching it. It's broken. >> >> I have to believe there are users who won't and who won't read the red sign. >> There's a good probability these are the kinds of users who will also be the >> most upset by data loss >> >> >> >> >> On Aug 8, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >>> >>> On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:37, J Chris Anderson wrote: >>> >>>> Devs, >>>> >>>> I have started a document which we will use when announcing the bug. I >>>> plan to move the document from this wiki location to the >>>> http://couchdb.apache.org site before the end of the day. Please review >>>> and edit the document before then. >>>> >>>> http://wiki.couchone.com/page/post-mortem >>>> >>>> I have a section called "The Bug" which needs a technical description of >>>> the error and the fix. I'm hoping Adam or Randall can write this, as they >>>> are most familiar with the issues. >>>> >>>> Once it is ready, we should do our best to make sure our users get a >>>> chance to read it. >>> >>> I made a few more minor adjustments (see page history when you are logged >>> in) and have nothing more to add myself, but I'd appreciate if Adam or >>> Randall could add a few more tech bits. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> In the meantime, I've put up a BIG FAT WARNING on the CouchDB downloads >>> page: >>> >>> http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html >>> >>> I plan to update the warning with a link to the post-mortem once that is >>> done. >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Thanks everybody for being on top of this! >>> >>> Cheers >>> Jan >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Chris >>>> >>>> On Aug 8, 2010, at 5:16 AM, Robert Newson wrote: >>>> >>>>> That was also Adam's conclusion (data loss bug confined to 1.0.0). >>>>> >>>>> B. >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8 Aug 2010, at 13:48, Noah Slater wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Do we need to abort 0.11.2 as well? >>>>>> >>>>>> 0.11.x does not have this commit as far as I can see. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Jan >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 8 Aug 2010, at 11:45, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8 Aug 2010, at 06:35, J Chris Anderson wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 7, 2010, at 8:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> is this serious enough to justify pulling current 1.0.0 release >>>>>>>>>> binaries to avoid further installs putting data at risk? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what Apache policy is about altering a release after the >>>>>>>>> fact. It's probably up to use to decide what to do. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Altering releases are a no-no. The only real procedure is to release a >>>>>>>> new version and deprecate the old one, while optionally keeping it >>>>>>>> around for posterity. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Probably as soon as 1.0.1 is available we should pull the 1.0.0 >>>>>>>>> release off of the downloads page, etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I also think we should do a post-mortem blog post announcing the >>>>>>>>> issue and the remedy, as well as digging into how we can prevent this >>>>>>>>> sort of thing in the future. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We should make an official announcement before the end of the >>>>>>>>> weekend, with very clear steps to remedy it. (Eg: config >>>>>>>>> delayed_commits to false *without restarting the server* etc) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think so, too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> Jan >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 8 August 2010 15:08, Randall Leeds <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Adam already back ported it. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my interstellar unicorn. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 7, 2010 8:03 PM, "Noah Slater" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Time to abort the vote then? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to get this fix into 1.0.1 if possible. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 8 Aug 2010, at 02:28, Damien Katz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone up to create a repair tool for w... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
