On Oct 14, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Brian Mitchell <[email protected]> wrote: >> couch_* seems a little repetitive. Why not core/, http/, etc? >> > > I think its important to keep couch in the app directory name. This > will come into play if people pull in couchdb code into other > packages. For instance, I think it'd make things confusing when people > make packages like BigCouch.
Yes, it's repetitive, but since all Erlang modules share a flat namespace it's definitely the right approach IMO. Best, Adam
