[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932476#action_12932476
]
Dale Harvey commented on COUCHDB-912:
-------------------------------------
It only allows attachments to design docs, but yeh its not a solution I
particularly like
a flag on the design doc I would much prefer, Its what I mentioned
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.couchdb.user/10681, forgot who pointed
me towards implementing it as a config option but I figured I would do it
quickly just so I could understand the implications.Hinnerk Haardts point out
that with a flag on the design doc you can have seperate login / business logic
design docs which would work fine.
is reading the database on every request to a design document ok / anyway to
cache it nicely?
I dont want this particular patch to go in, I just wanted to post it to mark it
as a priority because without it private couchapps are very very crippled.
> Anonymous Access to Design Docs on private DB's
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-912
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: HTTP Interface
> Reporter: Dale Harvey
> Attachments: anon.patch
>
>
> Right now people need to go through futon in order to login to couchapps
> running on private databases, this is a pretty big limitation on the type of
> couchapps that can be built
> Propose adding the ability for users to flag the design docs as readable for
> anonymous users, could be implemented though an attribute on the design doc?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
