On 26 Nov 2010, at 14:23, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 13:53, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: >> Obivously I agree we should be using official releases of mochiweb and >> ibrowse but that's not the case today, discarding the patches can >> potentially break CouchDB. I don't like it, but the fact that part of >> our source tree is imported from somewhere else is the current state >> of play. Happily, I think the delta is getting smaller all the time as >> the fixes and enhancements are applied upstream. > > That's good to hear. > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 14:13, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think handle both well (erlang_oauth has been neglected, but I'm working >> on updating it as we speak, it didn't progress much) and if you follow >> dev@ and commits@ you can clearly see that. > > Okay, sorry if I overreacted a bit, good to hear you're cleaning up > oauth (and sorry, I don't have the bandwidth to follow commits@).
Understandable. We could make things clearer in CHANGES. FWIW: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1039345&view=rev https://github.com/tim/erlang-oauth/pull/2 Cheers Jan -- > >> As for SSL an Mochiweb, it got SSL first. We (Robert) just updated the >> bundled Mochiweb version and started using the new SSL APIs. It's not that >> we added SSL to Mochiweb and then didn't push it back (modulo what Robert >> just wrote about that patch). > > Okay, sounds great, it wasn't clear from the commit message that > updated mochiweb. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
