I don't think we should make a release when we have a known and serious bug.
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 13:55, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Should we hold 1.0.2 for this? >> >> If releases are a whole bunch of work, then yes. >> >> However, since this doesn't seem to be a (recent) regression, it would >> IMHO be even greater if we had this 1.0.2 and a quick 1.0.3 once this >> thing is fixed. >> > > There was a separate issue in the CHANGES and NEWS that were enough to > veto the 1.0.2 artefacts. I'd vote to just wait for this to get sussed > out before moving forward with 1.0.2 again. > > Paul > >> Cheers, >> >> Dirkjan >> >
