On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: > On Dec 7, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, the mochiweb we're shipping in 1.1.0 has abandoned support for R12B05, >>> so we should revisit our minimum required Erlang version. Do we have a >>> compelling reason for supporting anything below R13B04? That release >>> introduces support for recursive type specifications, which are useful when >>> describing revision trees and JSON objects to dialyzer. >>> >>> Regards, Adam >> >> +1 for R13something. > > Paul, is there a NIF-based argument for a particular R13 release? I know we > don't use NIFs in 1.1.x, but it'd be nice to limit the number of times we > have to bump. > > Adam
There's nothing major that I remember in the R13 series. Maybe a few bug fixes or something, but I'd have to look. The major NIF jump was with R14. For instance, integrating Emonk requires R14. Also, NIF's are awesome.
