On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Volker Mische <volker.mis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12.01.2011 14:51, Benoit Chesneau wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Robert Newson<robert.new...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> 1.0.2 now has fixes for several serious issues. Unless there's another >>> known one of sufficient severity I think we should get 1.0.2 as soon >>> as we can. Can some other folks chime in with their take please? >>> >>> B. >> >> I'm just asking for 1 or 2 days, that's not to much. >> >> Until there are no blocker, we can then release. I don't see any >> reason to not do that. There have been so many fixes in 2 last week, >> that I think it could be good to take some time to test against our >> data. I even didn't have time to test your yesterday patch against my >> data where it was failling. >> >> - benoit > > For me those 1 or 2 days are the preparation of the release tarballs and > voting phase. > > Cheers, > Volker > Well vote is a formal way to test against final package. It take time to prepare artefact and manage process.
I guess you all have time to test in real condition last patches, I didn't. I even guess you tested last 2 patches against final data before they were closed, I didn't. Last one is important since replication is a big one and was able to reproduce with current replicator on another datasets around. Vote was stopped yesterday, in any serious businness, we would wait a little. - benoît
