Yep. Looks like a bug. I'll get to it eventually if no one beats me to it. Hint hint.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Martin Hilbig <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24.01.2011 22:30, Paul Davis wrote: >> >> I think more likely its that 12-12345 fails to parse as a correct >> revision and the error gets confused as it bubbles up the stack. >> >> To verify, try replacing 12-12345 with a modified version of the >> previous revision, ie, so it matches the (\d+)-([a-z0-9]{32}) regular >> expression. >> > > i changed the last bit of the revision and still get: > > {"error":"{not_found,missing}","reason":"{2,<<37,251,126,178,120,66,237,17,97,127,78,134,86,96,12,85>>}"} > > also klaus is right, i just stumbled upon COUCHDB-1018. > > have fun > martin >
