On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would suggest 3 or 5 retry. because at the end it make a process > that waited for > > 5 + 5000 + 50000 + 500000 ....
Benôit, I think you didn't get it right. It's like: 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, ... It doubles. I'll make the number of retries configurable, good suggestion. However need a good name for the parameter, as people might think "max_retries" is related to the number of retries per connection and not the number of retries to trigger a replication by the replication manager. > > a long process imo. Also 3 or 5 retry are common I think. > > - benoît > -- Filipe David Manana, [email protected], [email protected] "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
