Is there any update on this issue? Seeing as the tests are passing for everyone else for everything as well as the fact that these are the tests that fail when you try running make check with CouchDB running I'll assume it was just that for now.
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 16:06, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release >> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release. Please report your >> results and vote to this thread. >> >> We are voting on the following release artifacts: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~davisp/dist/1.0.2/ >> >> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.2 tag in Subversion: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.2/ > > This is what I get from my Gentoo Linux setup: > > Test Summary Report > ------------------- > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/070-couch-db.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/110-replication-httpc.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 6 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/111-replication-changes-feed.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 13 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/112-replication-missing-revs.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 12 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/113-replication-attachment-comp.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 45 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/130-attachments-md5.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 16 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/140-attachment-comp.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 86 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/150-invalid-view-seq.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0. > /var/tmp/portage/dev-db/couchdb-1.0.2/work/apache-couchdb-1.0.2/test/etap/160-vhosts.t > (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0) > Non-zero exit status: 1 > Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0. > Files=34, Tests=332, 42 wallclock secs ( 0.29 usr 0.09 sys + 16.02 > cusr 21.21 csys = 37.61 CPU) > Result: FAIL > > Where did I go wrong with this? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan >
