Sorry Noah, meant to reply earlier. If the argument that allows 80/443 for http/https is no longer enough, I don't see how we'll get this registration approved.
Is it possible to listen on one port and handle http and https correctly? I didn't think so, hence it listens on a different port. B. On 14 February 2011 12:30, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone? > > On 8 Feb 2011, at 20:53, Noah Slater wrote: > >> Help appreciated. >> >> He raises a good point though, as those links don't work now. >> >> I'm not sure what level of description they require. >> >> Probably nothing more than a handful of paragraphs to explain how CouchDB is >> a special use-case for HTTP. In the original submission for TCP 5984, I >> pointed out that TCP 80 is specifically reserved for "World Wide Web HTTP." >> My argument hinged on the fact that CouchDB is expected to be run on a >> machine (perhaps on a private interface) that is simultaneously serving up >> this kind of "World Wide Web" traffic, and so this warranted a separate port. >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> Dear Noah Slater: >>> >>> Thank you for your patience while your application was being reviewed. >>> The expert review team still has questions for clarifications with respect >>> to your request. >>> >>> - You provided the following for couchdb (#5984): >>> >>> http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=CouchDb_Quick_Overview >>> http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=Technical_Overview >>> http://www.couchdbwiki.com/index.php?title=HTTP_REST_API >>> >>> Do you have an updated description of the protocol CouchDB over TLS/SSL? >>> >>> - It will also be useful to include a fundamental description in >>> the template itself rather than points. URLs are useful, but they might >>> not be reachable in the future. IESG requires that the technical >>> description shall be documented in the application for future >>> reference purposes. >>> >>> If we do not receive the information within 30 days (i.e. 2011-03-10), >>> your request will be resolved without prejudice, as a matter of >>> administrative procedure. >> > >
