[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1013?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13011625#comment-13011625
]
Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-1013:
----------------------------------------
Thanks for those comprehensive tests Jan.
On a new Linux installation I compared branch 1.1.x against branch 1.0.x - only
set the nodelay option for 1.1.x, as Benoît found recently that under Linux it
has a significant positive impact -
https://github.com/benoitc/restkit/issues#issue/5
I made a 200 seconds relaximation read and writes test with documents of ~4kb
and here are the results:
http://graphs.mikeal.couchone.com/#/graph/698bf36b6c64dbd19aa2bef63404ecbc
These results match yours - 1.1.x has about the same performance as 1.0.x
(reads seem slightly better in 1.1.x)
Closing this ticket
> branch 1.1.x with worse database read/write performance
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-1013
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1013
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Filipe Manana
> Fix For: 1.1, 1.2
>
>
> The issue is described in an e-mail sent to the development mailing list:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201012.mbox/%[email protected]%3E
> It also affects trunk.
> Would love to have results from other on Linux/ext4, and other
> OSes/filesystems besides Mac OS X.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
