1004 is maybe worth a mention. Isn't it necessary for replication compatibility with upcoming 1.1? If so, it'd be good for people to know they should upgrade to 1.0.3 before trying to run in a heterogeneous environment with 1.1.
Other fixes that made it in which I don't see mentioned: 549 1037 1047 1049 1065 I don't know which of those you want to mention, but I did a quick scan of the log and these are what I thought might be worth stating. On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 17:48, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP0mQeLWCCo > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: >> As per the release procedure I'm asking developers for comments on >> releasing 1.0.3. Also per release procedure I am compelled to >> specifically ask people to check the NEWS and CHANGES files in the >> 1.0.x branch for changes since the last release. >> >> That is all. >> >
