On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > Is the purpose of this to just save adding a validate_doc_update that > throws if doc._user != userCtx.name? > > B. > No my proposoal is adding this _user member to doc like _rev and _id, so we can use it in validate_update functions, shows, changes filters or anything where we can access to this property.
In case of a change filter we could restrict a feed to a user or if the user is in group (would imply to pass the db security object to the change filter, which we should do imo). - benoit
