Bumped this on the 1.1.x branch with Benoit's concerns in mind. http://www.erlang.org/download_release/4 has a scary warning about anything less than R2.
Didn't make any decision on the NIF 1.2 issue, so that's still on the table. On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 07:28, Filipe David Manana <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it would be worth to probe the users' mailing list about this as well. > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:16 AM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Filipe David Manana >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I'm not sure if bumping to R13B04 is appropriate, since many Linux >>>> distributions (Ubuntu for e.g.) ship with older R13 releases. >>>> Therefore I would bump to R13B. >>> R13B01 seem the one used on some distri actually yes >>> >>>> >>>> Regarding NIF extensions, are we planning to have any by 1.2? >>>> >>> >>> There is the project of using emonk eventually . davisp ? >>> >> >> emonk requires R14 NIF's so I don't think it'll be in trunk for quite awhile. >> > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > [email protected], [email protected] > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." >
