On 16 Jun 2011, at 09:26, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > Well the fact that there was an existing thread but no action have > been taken make this one even more important and maybe this time we > can conclude by an action :) This is the joy of asynchronous mails > anyway.
It's not burning a hole in anything, so there's no rush. It wasn't blown away in the last release, and that's fine. We should blow it away as part of the next release.
