+1 for that, I don't like current directory structure. Cheers, Fedor.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm back on this topic. I know that @davisp made a script to split the > file structure etc, but I wonder why or what we are waiting to do > this. Also why using a script when we could move everything once? (and > it should be done once imo) > > For the record i'm working with a month or two on rcouch and its last > version in rcouch_templates [1] wich have splitted couch in some > modules (couchjs, snappy, ejson) and in the same time allowed couch to > be more otpish somehow. Maybe some tried it? Anyway I currently asking > myself how we want to integrate things with couch and autotools for > now. WHat is the file structure we want. Actually everything is in src > even external libs. > > I propose to do smth like > > src/couch sources > include/ > priv/ > libs/{mochiweb, snappy, oauth, ejson, ibrowse, ..} (or deps/) > c_src/{couchjs, icu, spawnkillable?} > etc/ > tests/ > bin/couch > other files (with autoconfstuff) > > Related topic, I would like to introduce a rel/ folder that would > allows us to build a real erlang release that would allows us to > install couchdb system wide or create any dev release, wich again > would be more otpish. We could also add the possibility to handle > custom templates for that which would make maintainer and distributors > happy. Most of these changes are already or rcouch so I would be glad > to port them to this build system. > > What do you think about it ? > > - benoît >
