On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:53, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 18:46, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Except if people have trouble installing / upgrading CouchDB, it leaves >> a bad taste. I'd rather not put users between a rock (1.7-based >> SpiderMonkey version) and a hard place (CouchDB only supporting 1.8.5 >> and up) > > Right. Also, if 1.2 takes a long time in coming (like some of the > previous releases), it would be nice if we'd get to use the state of > the art in JS sooner. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan >
I'm going to go forward with the following plan: 1) Make trunk compatible with SpiderMonkey 1.7 again. 2) Leave 1.1.x alone.* Let me know if this presents to anyone as egregiously offensive. * I'm sorry if this annoys anyone, but I don't want to backport something that isn't a bug fix. That's just how it's going to be. 50% policy, 50% time.
