[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13061503#comment-13061503
]
Noah Slater commented on COUCHDB-1175:
--------------------------------------
Saying that q values do not work in the real world is false. They work in some
situations, and don't work in other situations - like much of the web stack of
technologies.The solution you've proposed might break compatibility for a
completely different set of use cases. I think it might be a good idea to put
some kind of table together, with each use case we care about against
compatibility with each proposed solution. It would then be easy to visualise
where we should be making the trade-offs.
> Improve content type negotiation for couchdb JSON responses
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COUCHDB-1175
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1175
> Project: CouchDB
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.0.2
> Reporter: Robert Newson
> Assignee: Robert Newson
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.1.1, 1.2
>
>
> Currently we ignore qvalues when negotiation between 'application/json' and
> 'text/plain' when returning JSON responses.
> Specifically, we test directly for 'application/json' or 'text/plain' in the
> Accept header. Different branches have different bugs, though. Trunk returns
> 'application/json' if 'application/json' is present at all, even if it's less
> preferred than 'text/plain' when qvalues are accounted for.
> We should follow the standard.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
