[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-431?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13091349#comment-13091349
 ] 

Randall Leeds commented on COUCHDB-431:
---------------------------------------

Comments:
1) In check_origin/2, when * is in the AcceptOrigins would it be better to 
return * so that we send * in the "Access-Control-Allow-Origin" header?

2) could you pre-split Origin in check_origin/2 before passing it to 
check_origin1/2 so that we don't call mochiweb_util:urlsplit/1 repeatedly?

3) Makes sense to me to join check_origin/2 and check_origin1/2 into a single 
function. Use function guards to convert the accepted origins as you need them 
and to find the "*" case, avoids looping through the accepted origins twice 
(once for couch_util:to_list and once for lists:member).

4) Typo in set_prefilight_headers/4, clause 2, capitalization in 
Access-Control-ALlow-Headers

The rest are mostly aesthetics:

5) set_prefilight_headers -> set_preflight_headers typo (extra i)

6) You catch the case where erlang:get/1 in cors_headers/0 returns undefined, 
but that's impossible because you call set_default_cors_headers/0. It makes 
more sense to me to take out set_default_cors_headers/0 and just set the 
defaults in the undefined erlang:get/1 case.

7) Move cors_headers/0 up near default_origin_headers/1

8) I would get rid of set_preflight_headers/4 entirely. In 
preflight_cors_headers create PreflightHeaders0 after you get Origin1. Add 
{"Access-Control-ALlow-Headers", FinalReqHeaders} to PreflightHeaders0 in the 
last clause of the case and let PreflightHeaders be the result of the case. 
just call erlang:set/2 from there.

9) whitespace change at couch_httpd_db (-212, +247)

Obviously some of that is style, but some is substance. Take what you want. 
Nice work! Thanks for doing this.

> Support cross domain XMLHttpRequest (XHR) calls by implementing Access 
> Control spec
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-431
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-431
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>    Affects Versions: 0.9
>            Reporter: James Burke
>            Assignee: Benoit Chesneau
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431-2.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> 0001-cors-support.-should-fix-COUCHDB-431.patch, 
> A_0001-Generalize-computing-the-appropriate-headers-for-any.patch, 
> A_0002-Send-server-headers-for-externals-responses.patch, 
> A_0003-Usably-correct-w3c-CORS-headers-for-valid-requests.patch, 
> A_0004-Respond-to-CORS-preflight-checks-HTTP-OPTIONS.patch, cors.html, 
> test_cors2-1.tgz, test_cors2.tgz
>
>
> Historically, browsers have been restricted to making XMLHttpRequests (XHRs) 
> to the same origin (domain) as the web page making the request. However, the 
> latest browsers now support cross-domain requests by implementing the Access 
> Control spec from the W3C:
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/
> In order to keep older servers safe that assume browsers only do same-domain 
> requests, the Access Control spec requires the server to opt-in to allow 
> cross domain requests by the use of special HTTP headers and supporting some 
> "pre-flight" HTTP calls.
> Why should CouchDB support this: in larger, high traffic site, it is common 
> to serve the static UI files from a separate, differently scaled server 
> complex than the data access/API server layer. Also, there are some API 
> services that are meant to be centrally hosted, but allow API consumers to 
> use the API from different domains. In these cases, the UI in the browser 
> would need to do cross domain requests to access CouchDB servers that act as 
> the API/data access server layer.
> JSONP is not enough in these cases since it is limited to GET requests, so no 
> POSTing or PUTing of documents.
> Some information from Firefox's perspective (functionality available as of 
> Firefox 3.5):
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/HTTP_access_control
> And information on Safari/Webkit (functionality in latest WebKit and Safari 
> 4):
> http://developer.apple.com/safari/library/documentation/AppleApplications/Conceptual/SafariJSProgTopics/Articles/XHR.html
> IE 8 also uses the Access Control spec, but the requests have to go through 
> their XDomainRequest object (XDR):
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc288060%28VS.85%29.aspx
> and I thought IE8 only allowed GET or POST requests through their XDR.
> But as far as CouchDB is concerned, implementing the Access Control headers 
> should be enough, and hopefully IE 9 will allow normal xdomain requests via 
> XHR.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to