On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >> AFAIK, nobody wants security to ever replicate. Some people want to >> manually "sync" them as an application feature. >> >> -- >> Iris Couch >> > > Close. But I feel really, really dirty requiring admin access to > specific documents. Admin write access to _design/* is already dirty > enough. >
Primarily, mine is a request that that the feature (versioned _security) be generally useful. Seems a shame to put work into _security features when people want local per-db metadata for many reasons. Even today, you can read _security, so it's fine for you to read _local/security. But on write, yes, CouchDB gets "dirty." But couch always reacts to underscore stuff. If it were _local/_security would that be ok? :) Just hoping to move away from one-off URLs to provide features. -- Iris Couch
